Philenews

When the Best Doesn't Win

Published February 23, 2026, 14:09
When the Best Doesn't Win

The author begins with a thought born during a marathon in Seville: the marathon is relentlessly meritocratic, returning exactly the athlete's preparation. He extends this thought to society, wondering how much better things would be if institutions operated in the same way, choosing the most suitable based on effort, competence, and ethics. However, in Cyprus, the rule "This is Cyprus. It’s who you know – not what you know" often applies. The author refers to a specific example of a friend who was the most qualified for a job based on his qualifications, but was not selected due to other factors. This phenomenon of unfairness has a cost: it reduces the quality of decisions, opportunities are lost, and talented people become discouraged. Unfairness, when predictable, ceases to shock and becomes the norm, undermining the system and institutions. The author emphasizes that unfairness is not only a moral problem, but also a developmental and political one. In small societies, the temptation to help one's own is great, but the difference between support and distortion is subtle. Choosing the best is essential for the progress and prosperity of the country.