Sigma Live

Bagcioglu Sees Naval Power Gaps in the Aegean

Published January 28, 2026, 06:12
Bagcioglu Sees Naval Power Gaps in the Aegean

With a focus on developments in the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean, retired officer, MP and CHP Vice President responsible for defense issues, Yanci Bagcioglu, returns with a public intervention questioning the recent decisions of the Erdogan government to sell warships, which were designed for the needs of the Turkish navy, at a time when neighboring countries, such as Greece, are being equipped with modern frigates. "At a time when military and geopolitical risks in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean region are increasing and the fleet is under pressure due to the number of platforms and the aging of ships, the sale of main warships without achieving military goals is unacceptable from the point of view of national security," he writes in a post on X. Ships designed for war, not for export Bagcioglu raises the question of the military logic behind these decisions. As he notes, "the defense industry is not a sector that can be evaluated solely on the basis of commercial profit!!". He recalls that ships, such as the offshore type Akhisar, produced for the Turkish navy, were sold to Romania, despite warnings, and the sale of two frigates (TCG Smyrna, TCG Icel) is also being discussed. Hints of... Belara Bagcioglu's subsequent reference to "unchanged threats" and "risks increasing in our surrounding waters" is difficult to read separately from recent Greek arms procurement choices. In a scenario where, as he points out, Athens has proceeded to purchase a frigate from France and "its politicians have hardened their rhetoric," the transfer of two warships built for national purposes is characterized as a "major contradiction." As he emphasizes, the design of these ships was based on years of detailed and scientific study: threat assessment, operational needs, personnel projections and replacement of aging platforms. Given this, Bagcioglu questions what military logic justifies their disposal. Priorities questioned Bagcioglu appears particularly critical on the issue of prioritization. In an environment where main warships are being transferred with the argument that "there is no urgent need," he sees a contradiction in allocating resources to expensive aircraft carriers. For him, this constitutes problematic planning in a period of increased risks. National security versus economic benefit Bagcioglu acknowledges that exports from the defense industry strengthen Turkey's economic power and influence. However, he sets a clear condition: that the needs of the Turkish armed forces be fully met first, or at least not undermined. His warning is absolute: "ships intended for the Turkish navy are not commercial products, but basic elements of…