Philenews

Charalambidou, AKEL, and the Limits of Political Autonomy

Published February 12, 2026, 09:21
Charalambidou, AKEL, and the Limits of Political Autonomy

The rift between AKEL and Irene Charalambidou was the result of long-standing dissatisfaction and disagreements, culminating in the MP's refusal to comply with the three-term limit and her distancing from the candidacy of Andreas Mavroyiannis in the 2023 presidential elections. AKEL believes that Charalambidou's stance undermined the party's unity and its effort to elect Mavroyiannis. The case raises an important question about the limits of political autonomy of an elected official in relation to their commitments to the party that brought them to power. AKEL argues that Charalambidou did not respect the institutional framework and the party's statutes, while she appears to be seeking greater independence and autonomy. AKEL's decision to terminate its cooperation with Charalambidou, despite previous attempts at reconciliation, highlights the importance of party discipline and consistency in political commitments. The case also reveals the dilemma between electoral popularity and party identity, as Charalambidou enjoys significant public support, but joining another party could be seen as a breach of principles.