Philenews

Postponement or Pretense? The Real Stakes in the Iran Front

Published January 15, 2026, 21:09
Postponement or Pretense? The Real Stakes in the Iran Front

Despite many remaining skeptical, the prevailing assessment based on the evidence at this time is that Donald Trump has indeed decided to postpone a direct strike against Iran. Officially, the US President referred to information, as he put it, that the killings of protesters have stopped and the scheduled executions will not take place. However, it is doubtful whether such information actually exists and, even if it does, how reliable it can be. With protests spreading across the country and the unprecedented brutality of the regime —which has cost the lives of thousands of people— believing that the killings have stopped or could suddenly stop seems not only naive but almost tasteless, given the tragedy of the situation. What is happening? One scenario is that leaks to the media about pressures from Saudi Arabia, Oman and Qatar on the White House to avoid a direct strike —as well as similar reports that Israel also requested the same— constitute part of a tactic we have seen in the past: the deliberate obscuring of the landscape in anticipation of military action. And in the past, this tactic has paid off. On the other hand, such a move by the Gulf states, Turkey and Israel makes clear logical sense: avoiding the so-called “Domino Effect” and the widespread spread of the crisis in the region. The states of the Gulf fear —as does Israel, but also all the countries in the region— unforeseen developments in oil prices, as well as retaliation from the Iranian regime, either with strikes against Israel or with attacks on American military installations within their territory.